IP France Director Mrs. Martine MONTEILFINAL NOTICE Interpol NCB Paris 11 Rue des SAUSSAIES 75800 PARIS
Re: Final demand regarding the Liabilities and Responsibilities of IP France
Dear Madam:
This letter is written as a final attempt to (1) notify you of your liabilities regarding the damages Marc Campus has suffered due to your failure to act with care in the handling and processing of severely important information and to (2) request that you take the necessary steps by publicly acknowledging your error and by making an advance partial payment to repair the wrong without unnecessary delay.
We have been notified as of only August 29, 2007, that USNCB has finally received a response from Interpol France confirming Marc’s discharge of the judgment issued against Marc Campus on November 5, 1982 and overturned on February 1, 1985. USNCB has finally updated their database due to Interpol France’s late response. However, this does not erase the damage that has been done to Marc’s reputation and business endeavors over many years nor the liabilities of IP France.
As you know, Marc Campus was cleared of all charges on appeal in 1985. And still the inaccurate information was disclosed to outside agencies in 1991, 1996, 1998 and 2006. This information was forwarded initially from your organization network 6 years after the case was dismissed. As a direct result of this false disclosure, Marc Campus had new business agreements destroyed which cost him and his companies millions of dollars in loss.
Since then, Marc (with the assistance of others as well) have repeatedly requested that this information be corrected through several documented telephone calls and correspondence with your organization. Marc has been repeatedly told by your office that it is someone else’s fault. However, in 2006, Marc was told by a legal US adviser at the USNCB that is up to Interpol France to disclose the proper information. It is states in Interpol CCF May 15, 2007 letter addressed to Marc Campus “the necessary respect of the principle of exactitude of information, and consequently, to the duty of diligence/ordinary care which any entity in charge owes in connection with the processing of information of personal matter, in this case through the channel of Interpol.” However, the IP France-DCPJ reference numbers provided by USNCB showed its origin from The Direction Centrale de la Police Judiciaire through IP France which is the official office. Furthermore, Mrs. MONTEIL, the director of France NCB, you are also the DCPJ Director. The IP France-DCPJ reference numbers: DCPJ/AC/5APB/BCN NR 5188/GRI/NR 5710/DP/BM/91/5751, are clear evidence that the fraudulent conduct is directly linked to IP France.
If you fail to repair this wrong immediately, we will file a lawsuit in the United States Federal court and will present proof of how your organization mishandles personal important information, we will present proof of the fraud you committed by processing wrong information about an individual six (6) years after a man was exonerated, we will present proof of how you ignored and dismissed Marc’s numerous requests for aid to correct this wrong, we will present proof of how you claim it is not your fault but you are the official office which is in charge of the transmission of IP France-DCPJ reference numbers, we will present evidence of many business deals worth millions of dollars gone wrong for Marc because of your fraud and failure to help Marc in a timely manner, we will present evidence of how your actions impaired Marc’s reputation and we will present proof of how you just do not care about people’s individual freedoms and rights. And, all of this information will be published for the whole world to see.
In view of the clear liability, the nature of the damages sustained by Marc Campus, the damages he received to his reputation, the huge damages he received from failed business endeavors and the suffering he continues to experience today due to the unnecessary delay in receiving a partial payment to repair the wrong, we are confident that after reviewing all of the evidence submitted, Marc would receive judgment in excess of any monetary amount you may offer now.
Because of IP France’s actions, Marc had to experience infringement on his personal civil liberties and freedom. Marc’s ability to carry on legal trade with his partners in France, United States, Canada, Palestine, etc. was severely impaired. Marc suffered severe damage to his personal and business reputation. Due to the length of time it took to correct the wrong information, Marc also had past business endeavors destroyed. Because of these damages your organization created, we are requesting that your office take the following actions:
1. publicly acknowledge your action in starting the chain of events involving false information transmitted to outside agencies around the world; 2. document the entire truth in your records and send this documentation to all the outside agencies that may have received this false information; and 3. make an advance partial payment so that Marc Campus can start to repair the damage done to his reputation and past business activities.
If you refuse to take immediate action to honor our requests, you will have again breached your duty of good faith to Marc Campus and other governmental agencies for failure to mitigate damages and correct your own wrongs immediately when given the opportunity to do so.
We will hold this opportunity open until October 10, 2007. If no action is taken by said date, it will be withdrawn and we will file a lawsuit in the United States Federal Court and will proceed into litigation. I would appreciate hearing from you in reference to this offer. Please have your response sent to Marc Campus and CS 1 Group Legal Office Co. Wilmington, DE 19801 USA.
Your cooperation and anticipated prompt attention in this matter is greatly appreciated.